|
|
Post by KOCW on Oct 3, 2005 14:54:36 GMT
Hey all.
Since the new bans r in let's hear your thoughts on the cards that made the cut and those who didn't
I'll satrt with the really easy one for u all.
No more BLS
This is gd in the sense no one can top deck it against u ever again.
However its bad as it created so many variations of deck in the game. Sure they had him in but u could run BLS in anything with anything and still get a half decent result
|
|
|
|
Post by Thunder_Struck on Oct 3, 2005 15:56:21 GMT
Sinister Serpent:
the most abuseable card in the game was taken away from, even now with this no tribe, serpent would still be a sure staple purely becuase if u wanted something doing, costs, bluff, atking directly for 300 ATK!!! sinny was the dude to do it, a big loss for all advanced play.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bood on Oct 3, 2005 17:15:41 GMT
dark hole
why instantly create another staple, people probably would have been happy with vortex, shame, its gonna seriously abused by all.
but, it does create some interesting combos, horus lv 6 will love this card!
|
|
|
|
Post by Topman_2005 on Oct 3, 2005 17:24:16 GMT
I do think dropping tribe was a mistake, as UDE are saying they want themed decks?? Its irelavent if tribe is here or not, themed decks would'nt die via tribe, as we now have dark hole, and with him gone horus//decree ma seem a bit harsh without DD Hoe, Ass or exiled at hand....
Thats My opinion, oh and the C**ts banned Pot of greed xD
|
|
|
|
Post by KOCW on Oct 3, 2005 18:37:41 GMT
the thing is they brought dark hole back for tribe i reckon since dark hole would slow down trample decks and swarming
|
|
|
|
Post by Topman_2005 on Oct 3, 2005 19:08:03 GMT
This is true, but again, the whole horus thing, hell, not even lvl is affected by it....
|
|
|
|
Post by Thunder_Struck on Oct 3, 2005 21:31:53 GMT
they got rid of tribe for the reason stated obv. people just didnt like it. thats why sinister went, cuz tribe did, i love the new list, they brought dark hole in so that the game wasnt snail paced every match, we'd be averaging 16 time out matches a tourny if hole wasnt here :/
|
|
|
|
Post by KOCW on Oct 4, 2005 21:46:28 GMT
tru dark hole will help speed up the game
|
|
|
|
Post by KOCW on Oct 6, 2005 9:53:03 GMT
but how about mirror force going? was it needed?
|
|
|
|
Post by Thunder_Struck on Oct 6, 2005 11:31:36 GMT
imo mirror force was replaced by dark hole. mirror force was pretty kool obv. but i prefer dark hole over force any day.
|
|
|
|
Post by _ys_ on Oct 6, 2005 13:04:32 GMT
Would Raigeki have been better as a replacement for Mirror Force ?
|
|
|
|
Post by KOCW on Oct 6, 2005 16:12:02 GMT
probably but its so broken really + we got lighting vortex now so raigeki is most likely going to be banned for gd
|
|
|
|
Post by Chocobo! on Oct 6, 2005 21:31:06 GMT
pple are already using different cards and stuff, theyve really taken away a lot of drawing power and you cant even use 2 assailants instead of sinister. Also i think they banned sinister because of metamorphosis as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thunder_Struck on Oct 6, 2005 22:04:26 GMT
they banned sinsietr because it was leik most broken card!! tribe,vortex and the fact that if u got hit by duo the it was either picked by ur opooent or you, i always unless it was alredy there, would sangan search for sinister to my hand was just broken, thats why it ws banned.
and raigeki wouldve been far worse than dark hole, raigeki has no cost, and if its leik last few turns of game its leik own3d. at least dark hole takes all monsters :/
|
|
|
|
Post by Topman_2005 on Oct 7, 2005 9:50:26 GMT
Diff between mirror force and dark hole, which IMO, makes mirror leet, and hole suky, is hole can be too late, what with it being speel speed 1, and force being 2, swarms can't be stopped a turn late, force, or at least ring, should've stayed.
|
|
